Biblioteca Humberto Rosselli Quijano
Información del autor
Autor Martin Baggaley |
Documentos disponibles escritos por este autor (1)
Refinar búsqueda
Splitting in-patient and out-patient responsibility does not improve patient care / Tom Burns en The British Journal of Psychiatry, Año 2017 - Vol.210 - No.1 (Enero)
[artículo]
Título : Splitting in-patient and out-patient responsibility does not improve patient care Tipo de documento: texto impreso Autores: Tom Burns, Autor ; Martin Baggaley, Autor Fecha de publicación: 2020 Artículo en la página: pp. 6-9 Idioma : Inglés (eng) Idioma original : Inglés (eng) Palabras clave: Pacientes hospitalizados, Trastornos mentales, Servicios de salud mental, Pacientes ambulatorios. Resumen: Over the past 15 years there has been a move away from consultants having responsibility for the care of patients both in the community and when in hospital towards a functional split in responsibility. In this article Tom Burns and Martin Baggaley debate the merits or otherwise of the split, identifying leadership, expertise and continuity of care as key issues; both recognise that this move is not evidence based. Link: ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21945
in The British Journal of Psychiatry > Año 2017 - Vol.210 - No.1 (Enero) . - pp. 6-9[artículo] Splitting in-patient and out-patient responsibility does not improve patient care [texto impreso] / Tom Burns, Autor ; Martin Baggaley, Autor . - 2020 . - pp. 6-9.
Idioma : Inglés (eng) Idioma original : Inglés (eng)
in The British Journal of Psychiatry > Año 2017 - Vol.210 - No.1 (Enero) . - pp. 6-9
Palabras clave: Pacientes hospitalizados, Trastornos mentales, Servicios de salud mental, Pacientes ambulatorios. Resumen: Over the past 15 years there has been a move away from consultants having responsibility for the care of patients both in the community and when in hospital towards a functional split in responsibility. In this article Tom Burns and Martin Baggaley debate the merits or otherwise of the split, identifying leadership, expertise and continuity of care as key issues; both recognise that this move is not evidence based. Link: ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21945